Paper edge graphic Link to Homepage Logo Header
Link to Homepage Link to About EFC Link to Projects Link to Tools Link to Funding Resources Link to Training and Education Link to Publications
Paper edge graphic
Paper edge graphic
Paper edge graphic  
Photo of Faucet  

Past Projects

Use the navigation bar to review the projects that the UNC EFC has worked on.

Water

Photo of Bay Springs Lock and Dam - MississippiCorinth, Mississippi - Financing Scenario: The EFC assisted the Corinth Gas and Water Department (CGWD) to develop a cash flow analysis for their plan to replace their groundwater source with surfacewater from the Tennessee - Tombigbee Waterway. The EFC also helped CGWD gauge the perceptions of the five nearby utilities regarding the surface water project and to investigate how the existing capital reserve fund could be used to finance the project.
Photo of pipesTap and Impact Fees : The EFC conducted a survey of initial, one-time fees for new residential customers of North Carolina water and sewer utilities. Generally, utilities charge three types of fees in North Carolina: tap fees, impact fees and special assessments. This survey focused on tap fee and impact fee amounts and the bases that are used to calculate these fees for 325 water and/or sewer utilities throughout the State in 2005.

Photo of silt fenceStormWater Implementation Group: This was a seminar to improve the implementation of stormwater programs in North Carolina. The workshop consisted of local and state government officials and other key persons involved in stormwater implementation.

WSACC logoWater and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County (WSACC)
Governing Board Organizational Development Project:
The Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County, one of the state's largest multi-jurisdictional utilities, requested assistance from the Environmental Finance Center to provide organizational development support to the Board of Directors as part of their efforts to reexamine their governance structure and inter-jurisdictional financial policies. Other water/ sewer authorities should find this process applicable as their organizations mature and their boards enter similar cycles of evaluation.
Photo of junk yard
Disadvantaged Communities Programs: Through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) program, states receive funds from the federal government which used capitalize state managed revolving loan fund programs. States are given a degree of flexibility in how they design the programs including the ability to design special programs for "disadvantaged communities." This project included an inventory of EPA Region 4 states that have chosen to implement disadvantaged community programs and explores how NC should define a "disadvantaged community" as it relates to the DWSRF.
Image of Region 4Water and Sewer Financial Capacity and Affordability: The Environmental Finance Center conducted a policy analysis on the financial capacity of utilities. The analysis provided utilities and funding organizations with quantitative information at the community/utility level on the ability of utilities to meet anticipated capital financing challenges. As part of the analysis, the EFC researched reports and studies on documented needs and financial capacity. The study focused on North Carolina and other EPA region 4 states (Tennessee, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, and Kentucky).
Drawing of a damHydropower Relicensing: Opportunities for and Obstacles to Environmental Quality Improvements and Recreational Enhancements on Southeastern Rivers (603 KB; pdf): This report on the process and actual examples of hydro relicensing agreements in the Southeastern United States is a great introduction for local governments, citizen groups, and others who wonder what the possibilities are for environmental and recreational benefits from relicensing proceedings.

Photo of UNC wellSource water protection planning: “Source water protection” (SWP) involves preventing the pollution of both ground and surface water bodies that serve as sources of drinking water for communities. If the drinking water source is not protected, contamination can cause a community significant expense as well as endanger the public’s health. Cleaning up contamination or finding a new source of drinking water is complicated and costly. Proper planning can aid a community in protecting, not only current sources of water, but also water sources that may be tapped in the future in response to population growth and other factors.

 
Land

Image of NCFinancing Land Conservation: An important part of the EFC's work evaluated financing systems for land conservation. The EFC had completed several projects that helped explain the cost and means of financing land conservation. This page includes information about One NC Naturally, an initiative of the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, a NC state agency conservation funding needs assessment. The North Carolina "Land & Water Conservation Commission" was created at the end of the 2005-2006 legislative session. The Commission was tasked with identifying financing options for the State to reach its goal of securing a total of $1 billion over five years to add to conservation trust funds. The Commission met on 11/16/06 to hear from experts about the existing conservation funding streams. EFC's Richard Whisnant was among those who addressed the Commission. He presented the group with a full slate of funding options.

Image of report coverCosts and Financing Options for the North Carolina Million Acre Initiative: In 2000, the N.C. General Assembly enacted a commitment to protect an additional one million acres of North Carolina as dedicated open space over a ten-year period. The UNC EFC analyzed the extent to which conservation lands are already being acquired in the state; the estimated gap in between present rates of protection and the million acre goal; the estimated costs of filling this gap, including costs to local government in potential lost tax revenue; and some of the possible financing options to pay the costs of filling this gap. The report is by Richard Whisnant, Richard Norton and Jeremy Firestone (January 24, 2001) and is available in summary form or in its full text (820K pdf).

 

Waste

Photo of trash dump2005-06 Solid Waste Fee Schedules: The EFC provided support to the North Carolina League of Municipalities (NCLM) in carrying out their bi-annual survey of solid waste practices.The NCLM conducted a survey in summer/fall of 2005 related to the finance and practice of solid waste service provision. This survey yielded information on the fee schedules of garbage, recycling, yard waste, and bulk item collection for 130 North Carolina municipalities. See the NCLM web site for more information.
Photo of a classroom trainingWake County School Recycling Program Case Study: This UNC EFC case study detailed the Wake County Solid Waste Management Division's (SWMD) pilot program as well as its results which show that the SWMD can increase services, reduce costs and utilize partnerships with other organizations in order to will improve overall program efficiency, save up to 39% per year, and form the foundation for a sustainable recycling program supported by education for students.
Cost recovery logoCost Recovery Systems for Recycling: The UNC EFC worked on a pilot project in Orange County to develop and evaluated alternative cost recovery systems for communities with extensive recycling programs. The UNC EFC worked with County staff and a Citizens advisory board to make sure that program service objectives, as well as customer equity concerns are carefully considered and addressed. The project included preparation of financial planning and fee setting models capable of assessing a variety of different revenue options including district taxes, county wide taxes and targeted customer service fees.
 
Other

 Developing and Evaluating Environmental Finance Distance Education Tools: The UNC EFC in collaboration with state certification boards developed distance education tools for the certification of water and wastewater professionals on various environmental finance topics (accessing funding sources, rate setting, budgeting, etc.). These tools can be a cost-effective and interactive way for instructors and learners to supplement face-to-face and self-study learning.
Consortium on Growth in the Southeast: In conjunction with the Southern Consortium of University Public Service Organizations (SCUPSO), the Southern Growth Policies Board, and the Video Development Initiative (ViDe), with funding from the Southeastern University Research Association (SURA), the UNC EFC linked together with faculty around the southern United States who work on aspects of growth management. The means for this linkage was the emerging technology of large scale video networks (LSVN), under development for eventual widespread deployment on Internet 2. Faculty in the consortium use desktop videoconferencing to share thoughts and data about the numerous efforts at growth management around the region.

 
 
Link to Services
Link to Contact Us
Link to Useful Links
Link to Other EFCs